The web development company Kerala builds with.

Yes. A large share of the work is improving what already exists rather than replacing it — theme and plugin cleanup, Core Web Vitals, schema, and fixing the structural problems behind poor rankings. A rebuild gets recommended when the existing foundation would cost more to repair than to replace, and the audit shows you which one you are looking at.

Yes. The repository is yours from the first commit, hosted in your own GitHub or GitLab organisation. No proprietary builder, no licence that expires when the engagement does.

That is the default. Sanity, Contentful, Payload or WordPress sits behind the site depending on how your editors actually work, and they get training on the system they got rather than a generic manual.

A focused marketing site is typically four to six weeks. A multi-region site with a CMS and custom flows runs eight to fourteen weeks. You get a staging URL in week one and it stays current for the whole build, so progress is something you watch rather than something you are told about.

It depends almost entirely on how much of the site is bespoke. A template-driven business site and a custom web application are different orders of magnitude, and quoting either without seeing your requirements would be a guess. Every quote follows a scoping conversation and arrives itemised, so you can see what each part costs and drop what you do not need.

Only if it is done carelessly. Every migration starts with a crawl of the live site, a mapped redirect for every URL with traffic or links, metadata and schema parity checks, and daily index monitoring after launch. Done properly, a rebuild usually lifts rankings, because the technical problems holding the old site back go with it.

Both. Dashboards, booking flows, member areas, portals and internal tools get built on the same stack as the marketing site, so there is one codebase and one deploy pipeline to maintain rather than two teams and two invoices.

Core Web Vitals targets are agreed before design starts and enforced in CI on every pull request. A change that breaks the budget fails the build rather than surfacing in a quarterly audit. That is the only kind of performance promise worth making — the alternative is a number that is true on launch day and nowhere near true a year later.

Included. WCAG 2.2 AA is treated as a build requirement: semantic landmarks, keyboard paths, visible focus states and verified contrast, checked before handover. Retrofitting it later costs several times what building it in costs.

Every build is designed mobile-first and tested at 375px upward, because that is where most Indian and GCC traffic actually arrives. Layouts are checked in landscape and at the largest system text size too, which is where most "responsive" sites quietly fall apart.

Every build includes a warranty period where defects are fixed at no cost. After that, most clients keep a monthly support block — a named person who already knows the codebase, rather than a ticket queue that starts from scratch each time.